• ☰ Menu
  • home
  • News
  • Donate
  • Archive
  • Author
  • Maps
  • Links

Sudan Research, Analysis, and Advocacy

by Eric Reeves

The nascent divestment campaign against Talisman Energy, February 18, 2000

13 December 2004 | Early Analyses and Advocacy | Author: ereeves | 400 words

[February 18, 2000]

THE NASCENT CANADIAN DIVESTMENT CAMPAIGN AGAINST

TALISMAN ENERGY:

Eric Reeves

Smith College 413-585-3326

Northampton, MA ereeves@sophia.smith.edu

For almost four months now, Canadians committed to ending the destructive consequences of oil development in Sudan have been forced into a “wait and see” mode. Though not optimistic about Mr. Axworthy’s commitment to Sudan, they have been without a way to move directly against Talisman Energy’s ruthless participation in Sudan’s Greater Nile project.

Many have looked longingly at the roaring American divestment campaign, which has produced the sale of 2.5 million shares of TLM—with a number of other divestment sales impending. But now, with Mr. Axworthy’s abysmal moral failure of Monday, they no longer need look southward, and the communications I’m receiving, from many quarters and many contacts, make it clear that divestment will soon be a potent Canadian reality. Since 75% of Talisman shares are in Canada, there are both more and bigger targets of divestment opportunity. And some—like the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan [4.5 million shares] and the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement plan [3 million shares]—are ripe for extremely high-profile political activism. Canadian university campuses are also primed for action.

It’s also the case that the coverage of Sudan and Talisman has been much greater in Canada than in the US (which makes all the more impressive the successes of the American divestment campaign). As a result there will be less time between the application of divestment forces and the resulting divestment-driven sales: those owning or controlling TLM shares know full well what Sudan represents, what Talisman’s presence in Sudan represents—and just how angry vast numbers of Canadians are.

Canadians are much more likely than Americans (especially after the divestments of pension-plan giants TIAA-CREF and CalPERS) to have Talisman in their pension plans. That makes virtually every Canadian someone who might vote with his or her (financial) feet: “Divest from Talisman or: I’ll take my money elsewhere OR vote out the board that won’t divest OR sell shares held in my personal retirement account OR look for “Talisman-free mutual funds.” There are lots and lots of ways for Canadians to divest, or put pressures on those holding or controlling Talisman shares.

“High-priced spread” oil analysts in Canada have been scoffing at the American divestment campaign for some time, though rather less noisily recently. I suspect once Canadians get into the full swing of divestment the scoffing will cease altogether.

About the Author

cer1 Eric Reeves has been writing about greater Sudan for the past twenty-three years. His work is here organized chronologically, and includes all electronic and other publications since the signing of the historic Machakos Protocol (July 2002), which guaranteed South Sudan the right to a self- determination referendum. There are links to a number of Reeves’ formal publications in newspapers, news magazines, academic journals, and human rights publications, as well as to the texts of his Congressional testimony and a complete list of publications, testimony, and academic presentations.
Learn More

Photos and Tweets

See more photos

Maps

See More Maps

© 2025 · Eric Reeves · Log in